The second book in the Gathering Storm series for Warhammer 40,000, Fracture of Biel-Tan introduces the Triumvirate of Ynnead – The Visarch, Sword of Ynnead, Yvraine, Emissary of Ynnead, and The Yncarne, Avatar of Ynnead – and chronicles the desperate battle to determine the future of the Eldar, and the uneasy alliance that will potentially dictate the fate of the galaxy. And the Gathering Storm darkens over the entire galaxy. Unlikely alliances are formed in the face of desperation. A daemonic host assaults Biel-Tan, corrupting its infinity circuit. Eldrad Ulthran, High Farseer of Craftworld Ulthwe, puts into place a plan to bring forth Ynnead, the slumbering God of the Dead. Some Eldar refuse to abandon the glorious dream of building their ancient empire anew – or at least burning brightly before the end. No matter the methods they use to escape the notice of the god who haunts them, the Eldar sacrifice much in the process.
Though they long ago learned how to stave off the vile attention of She Who Thirsts – known as Slaanesh in the tongues of men – the Time of Ending yet tightens its grip on the Eldar. This message was edited 1 time.Warhammer 40K: Gathering Storm - Fracture of Biel-Tan
WARHAMMER 40K GATHERING STORM I FALL OF CADIA HC VERY RARE HARDCOVER SEALED. Whenever anyone claims "9tH EditIOn haS BEComE MTg!!!11" it can safely be read as "I have no idea what I'm talking about".Precisely. Warhammer 40,000 (40k) Gathering Storm Fall Of Caida Book. You finally put to words what my brain could not. Whenever anyone claims "9tH EditIOn haS BEComE MTg!!!11" it can safely be read as "I have no idea what I'm talking about". There are many valid points to be made about why the CP/stratagem system is bad, none of them have anything to do with MtG.Ĭomparing stratagems to MtG is nothing but a logical fallacy (appeal to emotion fallacy/genetic fallacy) - many people in the 40k community hate MtG and so you are trying to justify your hate for stratagems by connecting the two. If 40k and MtG are the same, 40k and backgammon are the same, because you are using dice to determine how far circular game pieces move and whether they take out other circular game pieces. Not going into detail (again), but the whole argument only exists because you are abstracting both games to a point where neither is recognizable anymore. You just spend X CP to use Y stratagem to boost damage for Z weapon instead of spending X lands to use Y spell to boost Z creatures damage potential.
Strats linked to resource management to boost damage IS what magic does it just uses mana+spells to boost creatures Jidmah wrote: The best part about this is all the people claiming stratagems are " MtG" can finally see first hand how wrong they are.Īctually just the opposite it proves the point.
0 kommentar(er)
